Skip to main content
Employer evidence pilot

See more than a résumé.

Explore a clearly fictional CRC evidence dossier before discussing a separately scoped, explicitly consented pilot. The example is not a real candidate result or a claim of hiring effectiveness.

Review a sample CRC Evidence Dossier

A fictional example, before you share any details.

FICTIONAL / ILLUSTRATIVE. This specimen explains the format only. It is not a real credential, a candidate result, or proof of employer acceptance. Real Passport evidence is shared separately under the holder's permissions.

Practice never becomes Passport evidence automatically. Verified entries require the approved human-review process.

Competency Passport · Fictional sample

Clinical Research Coordinator

Site operations · Participant protection · Data integrity · Safety communication

4.2 / 5Entrustable with minimal supervision

Illustrative score only

Verified2026

Employer verification

0A3F · 1B7C · 8E22

Illustrative code, not valid

Competency breakdown

Participant protection4.6
Protocol conduct4.2
Safety escalation4.4
Documentation integrity4.0
Study communication3.8

Evidence anchors

  • Eligibility judgment and supporting rationale
  • Safety escalation and follow-through
  • Source-to-system discrepancy resolution
  • Participant-facing study communication
Holder
Illustrative professional
Issued
14 Mar 2026
Valid until
14 Mar 2028
Credential ID
BKP-SAMPLE-001
Review
Human reviewed
Attempts
1 assessed attempt

Competency Labs is an independent platform. Our simulations and competency rubrics are designed to align with recognized clinical research competency frameworks, ICH-GCP principles, and global regulatory expectations. Competency Labs is not currently affiliated with, endorsed by, or accredited by IAOCR, ACRP, SOCRA, ICH, FDA, EMA, MHRA, Health Canada, TransCelerate, MRCT, ISO, or any regulatory authority unless expressly stated in a formal written partnership or accreditation notice. Learn more.

What you are looking at

Observable work, reviewed by a person, written so you can act on it

Built on the BORAKA Verified Competence Standard (BORAKA-VCS-CR-001).

  • Role requirements become observable tasks

    We translate a coordinator job description into the work a person would actually do in the first weeks.

  • Work is reviewed by a person

    An experienced reviewer reads the submitted work against written criteria and records what it showed.

  • You get readable evidence, not a score

    Strengths, developmental gaps and suggested interview probes, written so a hiring manager can act on them.

What you get

Structured input your hiring panel can act on

The sample demonstrates a format. A real pilot needs separate scope, participant consent and agreed permissions; it does not provide automatic access to a candidate's work.

  • Reviewed work samples

    A fictional example shows the evidence format. Any real work evidence requires the participant's explicit permission; private reviewer notes and written answers are not included in a shared Passport.

  • A rubric-scored comparison

    Scope, domain, status, date and rubric version make the record readable. A sample is not a scored comparison of real candidates.

  • An evidence-use conversation

    Discuss what scoped evidence can and cannot tell you, and which questions still belong in your own interview process.

  • A written summary

    Demonstrated strengths, open gaps and suggested interview probes, written so a hiring panel can read it directly.

Request the sample dossier

A few questions about how you screen today, so the pilot tests something useful rather than something convenient.

For example: site director, clinical operations manager, talent acquisition lead.

The single problem you would most want structured work evidence to answer.

Who would sign off if this became a paid pilot. Leave blank if you would rather not say.